I think some inspectors may argue that a field inspection is superior to a Remote Video Inspection. I would argue they are different inspection types with each having its own benefits over the other. From a pure technical aspect of inspecting, the field inspection is easier for the inspector to see things. An RVI Inspector needs a different level of experience. Over video, the inspector must think about what he isn’t seeing and ask to see it. I will concede (for the moment), not every inspection can be done using RVI technology. Some inspections may still require a field inspection. Looking at a stick-framed roof structure is challenging enough in the field- let alone trying to do this through the lens of a video camera. That said, if a reinspection item is to pad down a ridge for full rafter bearing- that can be done via an RVI. I think most truss roof framing inspections could be conquered via RVI.
During an RVI, the inspector is much better resourced and able to answer questions or address uncertainties. During field inspections, there are often times I would need to follow up with the contractor as I am unclear on how a code may apply to this specific situation. This keeps the contractor in a holding pattern waiting for direction. With an RVI, I have that information at my fingertips and we move forward saving the project time. For insurance reasons, the less people on a job site, the better. It is that simple. RVI’s have a significant upper hand in this measure. Many experienced field personnel take walking around a jobsite for granted, but I am constantly aware of my surroundings. Performing a rough inspection when the siding contractor is air-nailing siding outside can be unnerving. One less person inside equals less risk when that nail perfectly hits a gap in the sheathing and flies across the room. Time & Timing- a win for RVI. Simply said, when the contractor needs an inspection, calling for an inspection on demand often saves them a trip back to the site tomorrow. Why not have the inspection when you are already there? Often, contractors complete 95% of the job leaving 5% for when they return the next day and are waiting for the inspector. Then the inspector shows up and inevitably, the contractor is only 98% complete, necessitating a reinspection. Finish the job, call for inspection, have the RVI and [pour concrete, install insulation, hang drywall] as planned with certainty! The contractor and homeowner benefit from a project on schedule! The RVI will tend to cost less than a traditional field inspection. The RVI takes less time than a traditional field inspection. There is no travel for the inspector, the inspector is at a desk ready to go! In comparing the similarities and differences between traditional field inspections and RVIs, they are apples and oranges- but each completes the same task- just with different timing, risk benefits and pricing profiles.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Author
Brian Fragassi Archives
Categories
|